1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 689 S.W.2d
  5. 689 S.W.2d 400 (1985)
 

LINDSEY v. O'NEILL

No. C-3628.

689 S.W.2d 400 (1985)

George LINDSEY, et ux., Relators, v. Honorable Jack O'NEILL, Judge, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Rehearing Denied May 8, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Jiles Roberts, Buchanan Dam, for relators.

B.J. Walter, Jr., Liddell, Sapp, Zivley & Laboon, Jess H. Hall, Jr., Houston, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original mandamus action brought by George Lindsey and Betty Lindsey, individually and as next friends of their son, Thomas Daniel Lindsey, to compel Judge O'Neill to rescind his order limiting the scope of their Second Amended Notice of Deposition. This court has jurisdiction over this cause pursuant to TEX. REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 1733 (Vernon Supp.1985). Because we believe the trial court's order improperly restricted the scope of discovery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases