Judgment affirmed.
The court did not err when, for the purpose of impeaching defendant's credibility, it admitted testimony regarding statements voluntarily made by defendant at the time of his arrest, after he had testified in a manner inconsistent with the prior statements. (People v Harris,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.