1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 464 So.2d
  5. 464 So.2d 602 (1985)
 

SCHIMMEL v. MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE ETC.

No. 83-2775.

464 So.2d 602 (1985)

Lawrence H. SCHIMMEL and Lawrence H. Schimmel, P.A., and Lois H. Schimmel, Appellants, v. MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INC., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 26, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Miami, for appellants.

Dennis G. King, Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Schuster & Russell; Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin and Joel D. Eaton, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The post-trial order under review is affirmed insofar as it grants a renewed motion for directed verdict made at trial by the plaintiff [Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.] on its main claim against the defendants [Lawrence H. Schimmel, Lawrence H. Schimmel, P.A., Lois Schimmel] and enters judgment for the said plaintiff in the amount of $4,500. We agree entirely with the reasons given by the trial court in the order under review for granting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases