Upon reargument, original determination adhered to.
Our review of the record establishes that the identification testimony adduced at trial was sufficient as a matter of law to sustain defendant's conviction. Moreover, the trial court properly exercised its discretion by permitting codefendant's counsel to recall an eyewitness to reopen cross-examination based upon counsel's offer of material and relevant proof (see, People v Ventura,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
