1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 708 P.2d
  5. 708 P.2d 355 (1985)
 

STATE v. NEIDENBACH

CC 82-469-C-2; CA A32517; SC S31835.

708 P.2d 355 (1985)

300 Or. 176

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner On Review, v. Henry Lee NEIDENBACH, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided October 29, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Ronald K. Cue, Ashland, argued the cause for respondent on review.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appealed the revocation of his probation and the imposition of a prison sentence. We allowed review to decide whether the exclusionary rule applies to probation revocation hearings. However, we cannot reach this issue because this matter is moot.

Defendant was convicted of third degree assault in 1982 and was placed on two years' probation. While on probation, he was charged with manufacturing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases