Defendant challenges his convictions after three discrete jury trials involving separate instances of criminal activity. Inadequacy of proof and ineffective assistance of counsel are the deficiencies alleged.
With respect to the claim that the evidence was inadequate, the first trial, which culminated in a conviction of criminal sale of marihuana in the third degree, hinged on the credibility to be afforded conflicting testimony...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
