BRADLEY v. MILLIKEN

Nos. 84-1364, 84-1365.

772 F.2d 266 (1985)

Ronald BRADLEY, et al., Plaintiffs (84-1364), Plaintiffs-Appellants (84-1365), v. William J. MILLIKEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Detroit Federation of Teachers, Intervening Defendant-Appellant (84-1364), Intervening Defendant (84-1365).

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided September 16, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore Sachs (argued), Sachs, Nunn, Kates, Kadushin, O'Hara, Heveston, Waldman, John Runyan, Jr., Detroit, Mich., for appellants.

Paul J. Zimmer, Jr., Lead Counsel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lansing, for Milliken et al.

George T. Roumell, Jr. (argued), Riley & Roumell, Detroit, for School Dist. of City of Detroit.

Dr. Kenneth Harris, Dr. Philip E. Runkel, William Waterman, Pontiac, Mich., for LULAC.

Before MERRITT and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.


CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal questions the propriety of an order of the district court terminating portions of the remedy imposed in this school desegregation case. The appellants are the plaintiff class1 and the Detroit Federation of Teachers, a defendant in intervention. The district court's order provided for the termination of its jurisdiction over the Detroit school system's code of student conduct and community relations program...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases