STATE v. STOTESBERY

No. C9-83-1520.

360 N.W.2d 678 (1985)

STATE of Minnesota, City of La Crescent, Respondent, v. Bruce Allan STOTESBERY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 22, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Linda F. Close, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, William V. Von Arx, LaCrescent City Atty., Caledonia, for respondent.

Ross A. Phelps, La Crescent, for appellant.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., PARKER, and FOLEY, JJ., with oral argument waived.


SUMMARY OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Following a jury trial on August 2, 1983, appellant was convicted of D.W.I. under Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(d) (1982). On appeal he claims that the Commissioner of Public Safety failed to promulgate standards for the nurse who drew a blood sample from him. We affirm.

DECISION

Appellant's contention was specifically addressed in Ouimby v. State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases