SCOTT v. SCOTT

No. C1-85-138.

373 N.W.2d 652 (1985)

Kristin Lee SCOTT, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Daniel Clinton SCOTT, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 3, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger S. Van Heel, Stearns Co. Atty., Richard J. May, Asst. Stearns Co. Atty., St. Cloud, for appellant.

Daniel Clinton Scott, pro se.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J. and SEDGWICK and NIERENGARTEN, J., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant, the custodial parent of a minor child, disputes an order which redetermines respondent's child support obligation. We affirm the trial court's partial forgiveness of support in arrears, and we reverse and remand on the court's decision to alter respondent's future obligation.

FACTS

The marriage of the parties was dissolved in 1981, and custody of the couple's minor child placed with appellant Kristin Scott...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases