Petitioner has excepted to several of the Board's findings of fact. He contends that these findings are not supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record, and are arbitrary and capricious.
In reviewing the sufficiency of a board's findings of fact, the reviewing court must examine the "whole record" to determine if there is substantial evidence in the record to support the board...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
