1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 19 Ohio
  5. 19 Ohio St. 3d 83 (1985)
 

HUFFMAN v. HAIR SURGEON, INC.

No. 84-1592.

19 Ohio St. 3d 83 (1985)

HUFFMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HAIR SURGEON, INC., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 9, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gehrig, Parker & Baldwin and Michael F. Gehrig, for appellants.

Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis and John W. Hust, for appellee.

Keating, Ritchie, Lyon & Norwine and Michael F. Lyon, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Per Curiam.

This court held in the syllabus of Jones v. Murphy (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 84, that "Civ. R. 37 permits the exclusion of expert testimony pursuant to a motion in limine as a sanction for the violation of Civ. R. 26(E)(1)(b)." In reaching this conclusion we reasoned at 86:

"One of the purposes of the Rules of Civil Procedure is to eliminate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases