SUSQUEHANNA REALTY CORP. v. BARTH


108 A.D.2d 909 (1985)

Susquehanna Realty Corp., Respondent, v. Herbert Barth et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 25, 1985


Judgment reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, it is declared that no easement was created in favor of plaintiff, and the complaint is otherwise dismissed.

It is well settled that a prescriptive easement arises by the adverse, open, notorious and continuous use of another's land for the prescriptive period (Di Leo v Pecksto Holding Corp., 304 N.Y. 505; see also, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases