1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 177 Cal.App.3d
  5. 177 Cal.App.3d 831 (1985)
 

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ v. CITY OF WATSONVILLE

Docket No. A024880.

177 Cal.App.3d 831 (1985)

223 Cal. Rptr. 272

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF WATSONVILLE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

August 23, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Donald R. Haile, City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants.

Weiser, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Herbert M. Weiser, Goldfarb & Lipman, Lee C. Rosenthal, McDonough, Holland & Allen, T. Brent Hawkins, Joseph E. Coomes, Jr., Straddling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth and Thomas P. Clark as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.

Dwight L. Herr, County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

AGLIANO, J. —

Introduction

The instant action involves interpretation of the scope of the Westside Industrial Redevelopment Plan which was drafted and implemented by defendants City of Watsonville (City) and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Watsonville (Agency) in 1973.1 Nine years after the Plan was adopted, plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases