1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 114 A.D.2d
  5. 114 A.D.2d 887 (1985)
 

LO PALO v. LO PALO

114 A.D.2d 887 (1985)

Louis Lo Palo, Appellant, v. Susan Lo Palo, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 12, 1985

Order affirmed, with costs.

A review of the record indicates that Special Term did not abuse its discretion in its grant of pendente lite relief to defendant. Furthermore, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in referring the plaintiff's cross motion to the trial court. The ultimate disposition of the issues of maintenance, support, and the execution of a substitute second mortgage should be made after a trial (see, Ellenis v Ellenis,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases