MINETTO v. MARAGLIANO


110 A.D.2d 890 (1985)

Orlando Minetto et al., Respondents, v. George Maragliano, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 29, 1985


Order affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances, it was a proper exercise of discretion for Special Term to conclude that the delay in service of the reply to the counterclaim was excusable and that the reply was meritorious (see, CPLR 2005; Sanders & Assoc. v Hague Dev. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 964

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases