SZABO v. ASHLAND OIL CO.

No. 83-9.

448 So.2d 549 (1984)

Sandor SZABO and Joan Szabo, His Wife, Appellants, v. ASHLAND OIL COMPANY, Exxon Corporation, Allen Chemical Company, and Bostick Chemical, a Division of Usm Corporation, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 27, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary E. Garbis, Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, for appellants.

Dixon, Dixon, Hurst & Nicklaus, and James A. Dixon, Jr., Mitchell, Harris, Canning, Murray & Usich, Highsmith, Strauss, & Glatzer, Preddy, Kutner & Hardy and G. William Bissett, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

FERGUSON, Judge.

Plaintiff brought suit against nine defendants, alleging injury in the course of his employment from exposure to chemical products manufactured by the defendants. Motions for summary judgment were made by four of the defendants on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.1 The defendants' motions were supported by plaintiff's own testimony on deposition wherein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases