MATTER OF DANIEL


63 N.Y.2d 927 (1984)

In the Matter of the Adoption of Daniel C., an Infant. James N. S. et al., Respondents; Claire C., Appellant. Robert Abrams, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Intervenor-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 30, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Silk for appellant.

Robert Goldstein for respondents.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Florence E. Abrams, Peter H. Schiff and Robert Schack of counsel), intervenor-respondent pro se.

Judges JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur; Judge JASEN dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion; Chief Judge COOKE taking no part.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

We do not find it necessary to reach the question whether section 115-b of the Domestic Relations Law requires that a consent form recite the effect of a notice of revocation set forth in subdivision 1 (par [d], cl [ii]) of that section or appellant's contention that a consent form which fails to do so is constitutionally infirm. By...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases