1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 322 S.E.2d
  5. 322 S.E.2d 658 (1984)
 

STATE EX REL. EDMISTEN v. CHALLENGE, INC.

No. 8310SC1121.

322 S.E.2d 658 (1984)

STATE of North Carolina ex rel. Rufus L. EDMISTEN, Attorney General v. CHALLENGE, INC., Edward G. Rector, Douglas L. Beekman, Carol A. Rector, Allen K. Oaks, and Richard Mailman.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 4, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. John R.B. Matthis, and Asst. Attys. Gen. Philip A. Telfer, Alan S. Hirsch, Raleigh, for the State.

Purser, Cheshire, Manning & Parker by Thomas C. Manning and Barbara A. Smith, Raleigh, for defendants-appellants.

EAGLES, Judge.

On the basis of the pleadings and issues of fact found by the Court to be uncontested pursuant to Rule 56(d) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, the trial court granted summary judgment against the defendants, finding them in violation of N.C.Gen.Stat.Sec. 14-291.2 (1981) (prohibiting pyramid or chain schemes), and N.C. Gen.Stat.Sec. 75-1.1 (prohibiting unfair and deceptive trade practices). By judgment entered 9 June 1983, the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases