BARFIELD v. SEATTLE

No. 49706-1.

100 Wn.2d 878 (1984)

676 P.2d 438

DAVID F. BARFIELD, ET AL, Petitioners, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ET AL, Respondents. MARY KATE GARDNER, ET AL, Respondents, v. GARY McNULTY, ET AL, Petitioners.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 26, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lembhard G. Howell, for petitioners Barfield, et al.

Stafford, Frey & Mertel, by Stephen P. Larson, for petitioners McNulty, et al, and respondents City of Seattle, et al.

Franklin W. Shoichet, for respondents Gardner, et al.


DOLLIVER, J.

In these consolidated cases we review two pretrial discovery orders involving Seattle Police Department Internal Investigation Files (SPDIIF). At issue is whether plaintiffs may obtain discovery of SPDIIF involving prior complaints against the officers in actions alleging tortious conduct by police officers; negligent hiring, retention, and discipline; and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights violations.

In Barfield v. Seattle the following facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases