SNIPES v. JACKSON

No. 8314SC695.

316 S.E.2d 657 (1984)

Edgar W. SNIPES v. George W. JACKSON, L.H. Veazey, and Thomas, Knight, Trent, King and Company.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 19, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maxwell, Freeman, Beason & Morano by James B. Maxwell and Mark R. Morano, Durham, for plaintiff-appellant Edgar W. Snipes.

Spears, Barnes, Baker & Hoof by Alexander H. Barnes, Durham, for defendant-appellee George W. Jackson.

Mount, White, King, Hutson & Carden by Richard M. Hutson, II and Elizabeth R. Stuckey, Durham, for defendants-appellees Veazey and Thomas, Knight, Trent, King and Co.


ARNOLD, Judge.

Since the trial court did not specify the grounds upon which defendants' motions for summary judgment were granted, this Court must examine every basis for the rulings. The record on appeal indicates that summary judgment in defendants' favor could have been entered because the trial court believed plaintiff's action was barred by the statute of limitations. In the alternative the court may have decided there was no issue of fact regarding the allegations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases