MTR FISHEL v. CONCILIATION BD.


123 Misc.2d 841 (1984)

In the Matter of Fay Fishel, Petitioner, v. New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

March 19, 1984


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pomeranz & Pomeranz (Norman Katz of counsel), for petitioner. Ellis S. Franke and Patrick K. Munson for respondent. Mark Hus for Emma Walker, intervenor.


LEONARD SCHOLNICK, J.

This is a CPLR article 78 proceeding in which the petitioner owner of a building containing rent-stabilized apartments seeks in effect review of an order issued by the Conciliation and Appeals Board (Board) which directed the owner to offer the tenant a renewal lease on the same terms and conditions as the tenant's previous leases. The proceeding is improperly labeled "declaratory judgment". The facts are not in dispute.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases