1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 12 Ohio
  5. 12 Ohio St. 3d 84 (1984)
 

JONES v. MURPHY

No. 83-1411.

12 Ohio St. 3d 84 (1984)

JONES ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MURPHY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 11, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson & Johnson Co., L.P.A., and Mr. Danny D. Johnson, for appellants.

Messrs. Hanhart, Miller, Kyler & Richards and Mr. James J. Pringle, for appellee.

LOCHER, J.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure permit the exclusion of expert testimony pursuant to a motion in limine as a sanction for the violation of Civ. R. 26(E)(1)(b). For the reasons that follow, we answer in the affirmative, and thus uphold the court of appeals' decision.

Appellants do not dispute the fact that they have violated Civ. R. 26(E) (1)(b)1 by failing to supplement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases