¶ Judgment affirmed.
¶ In defendant's omnibus motion papers, he did not raise the issue of his warrantless arrest as a ground to suppress his station house statements. At the suppression hearing the court was asked to rule upon the factual question of whether defendant had made statements as the result of police misconduct. At no time did counsel argue that defendant's statements should have been suppressed as a result of an arrest effected in his home without...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
