R.M. PARRANTO CO. v. BERNICK

No. C5-84-181.

354 N.W.2d 600 (1984)

R.M. PARRANTO COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. Herbert BERNICK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 18, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark S. Genereux, Douglas B. Fink Law Offices, P.A., St. Paul, for respondent.

Neal J. Shapiro, Bernick & Shapiro, Chartered, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LESLIE and CRIPPEN, JJ.


OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Plaintiff R.M. Parranto Company, Inc. brought this action against defendant Bernick for a real estate commission allegedly due and owing. After a trial without a jury, the trial court ordered judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from that judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

In July 1980 Leland A. Holm listed an improved commercial property in the St. Paul midway area with plaintiff R.M. Parranto Co., a real estate brokerage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases