SWARTWOUDT v. SWARTWOUDT

No. C2-83-1665.

349 N.W.2d 600 (1984)

In re the Marriage of Beverly G. SWARTWOUDT, Petitioner, Respondent, v. David E. SWARTWOUDT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 12, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard E. Borene, Lampe, Fossum, Jacobson, Borene & Crow, Northfield, for respondent.

Thomas M. Neuville, Grundhoefer & Neuville, Northfield, for appellant.

Heard, considered, and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and HUSPENI and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This appeal is from an amended judgment. There was no motion for a new trial. The time for appeal from the original judgment had run. The amended judgment did not change any of the provisions of the original judgment with respect to custody of the minor child, the sole issue raised on appeal. That issue is not reviewable as of right. The record is detailed and lengthy. The interests of justice do not require that we exercise our right...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases