STATE v. ROBINSON

No. 50265S; CA A29412.

678 P.2d 270 (1984)

67 Or.App. 391

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William Weaver ROBINSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 14, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerry Kobelin, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On brief was Michael J. Kavanaugh, Portland.

Brenda J. Peterson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, Presiding Judge, and WARREN and ROSSMAN, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 487.540. He contends that, because the prosecutor voiced no objections, it was error to deny his motion to exclude witnesses. In support of his contention, defendant relies on State v. Bishop, 7 Or.App. 558, 492 P.2d 509 (1972), in which we held that, when a trial court fails to grant an unopposed motion to exclude witnesses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases