CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. HEEKIN

D.D. No. 83-33.

9 Ohio St. 3d 84 (1984)

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HEEKIN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 25, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John H. Burlew, Mr. James A. Vogele, Mr. Charles S. Kamine and Mr. Edwin W. Patterson III, for relator.

Mr. Jack C. Rubenstein, for respondent.

Mr. Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Mr. Mark H. Aultman, urging disbarment for amicus curiae, Office of Disciplinary Counsel.


Per Curiam.

Respondent did not deny his involvement in the theft of over three quarters of a million dollars worth of utility services for his corporation. Such criminal activity cannot be lightly regarded by this court in its attempt to maintain the high ethical standards which must be an integral part of the legal profession in Ohio. Therefore, this court is compelled to go a step further than the recommendation of the board and permanently disbar the respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases