1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 743 F.2d
  5. 743 F.2d 195 (1984)
 

CONTI v. FORD MOTOR CO.

No. 83-1792.

743 F.2d 195 (1984)

CONTI, Patricia and Conti, Richard, husband and wife v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Winner Ford, J/S/A v. Richard CONTI. Appeal of FORD MOTOR COMPANY.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided September 17, 1984.

As Amended September 20, 1984.

Rehearing Denied October 12, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph V. Pinto (argued), William J. Conroy, White & Williams, Philadelphia, Pa., for Ford Motor Company.

Joseph F. McNulty, Jr. (argued), Albert J. Schell, Jr., Post & Schell, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., for Richard Conti.

James J. Binns (argued), James J. Binns, P.A., Philadelphia, Pa., for Patricia Conti and Richard Conti.

Arthur E. Ballen, Ballen, Keiser, Denker, Bor & Gertel, Camden, N.J., for Patricia Conti.

Before GIBBONS, HUNTER, and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises from a jury verdict in favor of appellees Patricia and Richard Conti and against appellant Ford Motor Company ("Ford"). The district court, 578 F.Supp. 1429, denied Ford's post-trial motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Because we conclude that the district court erred in not granting judgment in Ford's favor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases