1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 682 P.2d
  5. 682 P.2d 243 (1984)
 

IN RE HOLMAN

No. 81-94; SC 29335.

682 P.2d 243 (1984)

297 Or. 36

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of H. Kent HOLMAN, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided May 1, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David C. Landis, Portland, argued the cause for the accused. With him on the briefs were David R. Foster, Vicki Hopman Yates, and Landis, Aebi & Bailey, P.C., Portland.

Millard M. Becker, Portland, argued the cause for the Or. State Bar. With him on the brief was Becker, Sipprell & Hunt, Portland.

PER CURIAM.

The Oregon State Bar complains that the accused attorney, as trustee of the "Jackson Trust," an express trust, in the approximately two and one-half year period from the late Fall of 1978 to the Summer of 1981, stole some $42,000 from the trust assets in violation of a disciplinary rule, DR 1-102(A)(4), which provides:

"A lawyer shall not: [e]ngage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation."

The Bar further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases