¶ A default judgment was entered against defendant apparently on the basis that defendant had failed to serve a timely answer. The record discloses that the defendant had in fact served a timely answer but that it had been rejected by plaintiff's counsel on the ground that it had been served by counsel not of record, and that there had been no compliance with the requirements of CPLR 321 (subd [b]) regulating change of counsel. ¶ Although plaintiff's counsel may...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.