UMSTEAD v. DURHAM HOSIERY MILLS, INC.

No. C-83-1168-D.

578 F.Supp. 342 (1984)

A. Bruce UMSTEAD, Margaret W. Umstead and Willie Lea Farthing, Plaintiffs, v. DURHAM HOSIERY MILLS, INC., and George A. Cralle, H.E. Schoenhut, Jr., John P. Barnett, and Frederick L. Russell, Individually, Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Durham Division.

January 26, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Woodward Webb of Broughton, Wilkins & Webb, Raleigh, N.C., Kevin P. Roddy, Charlottesville, Va., for plaintiffs.

L. Bruce McDaniel of DeBank, McDaniel; Heidgerd & Holbrook, Raleigh, N.C., G. Eugene Boyce of Boyce, Mitchell, Burns & Smith, Raleigh, N.C., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HIRAM H. WARD, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is defendants' pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (October 31, 1983) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (6). (November 22, 1983). Defendants have requested a hearing, but the Court finds that a hearing would not aid resolution of this matter. The Court will deny the Motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases