1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 459 So.2d
  5. 459 So.2d 459 (1984)
 

BORGES v. STATE

No. 84-350.

459 So.2d 459 (1984)

Raul BORGES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gold & Fox and Myron M. Gold, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Renee E. Ruska, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Even if, arguendo, it can be said that a hearing pursuant to Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971), was required when it appeared that the State had not produced for the defendant's examination and inspection an item of physical evidence, the existence, location and availability of which was at all times well known to the defendant, the inquiry conducted by the trial court met the requirements of Richardson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases