1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 100 A.D.2d
  5. 100 A.D.2d 810 (1984)
 

MOSKOWITZ v. MASSACHUSETTS INST. OF TECH.

100 A.D.2d 810 (1984)

Norina Moskowitz, Respondent-Appellant, v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology et al., Defendants, and Burns International Security Systems, Inc., Appellant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 24, 1984

If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment as so amended and reduced is affirmed, without costs. ¶ After review of the record, we find the judgment to have been excessive to the extent indicated.

Alexander, J. (dissenting).

I find no warrant for the drastic reduction of the jury's verdict made by the majority. The uncontradicted testimony shows that this plaintiff, who has already undergone over 100 skin graft and other operations in an effort...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases