1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 101 A.D.2d
  5. 101 A.D.2d 803 (1984)
 

ERDHEIM v. ERDHEIM

101 A.D.2d 803 (1984)

Carla Erdheim, Respondent, v. Michael Erdheim, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 7, 1984

¶ Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

¶ A review of the supporting and opposing papers submitted to Special Term, as well as the appropriate statutory guidelines, indicates that the pendente lite awards to plaintiff did not constitute an abuse of discretion (Domestic Relations Law, § 236, part B, subd 6; Rossman v Rossman, 91 A.D.2d 1036). Moreover, the remedy for pendente lite

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases