PATIN v. POPINO

Nos. 83-3028, 84-20.

459 So.2d 435 (1984)

Diane Barker PATIN, F/K/a Diane Barker, Appellant, v. Carl A. POPINO, the Estate of Carl A. Popino, Phyllis T. Popino, Randy Rose, Richard Carmel and Rocco A. Delmonaco, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 20, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Greene & Cooper and Robyn Greene, Miami, for appellant.

Ramon David Feliu, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The order denying the appellant's motion under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 to vacate an order impressing an attorney's charging lien on the appellant's home is reversed. Even assuming, arguendo, that the appellees were entitled to recover attorneys' fees for their labors on the appellant's behalf in the underlying litigation, that litigation terminated with a final judgment of foreclosure in appellant's favor in January 1982, in which jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases