1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 36 Cal.3d
  5. 36 Cal.3d 852 (1984)
 

PEOPLE v. HOWARD

Docket No. Crim. 23091.

36 Cal.3d 852 (1984)

686 P.2d 644

206 Cal. Rptr. 124

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GENE MARTIN HOWARD, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

September 13, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Philip Schmidt for Defendant and Appellant.

George Deukmejian and John K. Van de Kamp, Attorneys General, Robert H. Philibosian, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Daniel J. Kremer, Assistant Attorney General, Harley D. Mayfield, Keith I. Motley and M. Howard Wayne, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

BIRD, C.J.

Does a reconciliation by a husband and wife cancel a child custody order which had been granted as part of an interlocutory decree of dissolution?

I.

In July 1978, after six years of marriage, Gene and Pamela Howard obtained an interlocutory judgment of dissolution, which gave Pamela custody of the couple's two children. Gene was given visitation rights under the decree.

One month later...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases