HURA v. MITCHELL


100 A.D.2d 780 (1984)

Stanley E. Hura, Doing Business as Stanley Hura Interiors, Appellant, v. Kay Mitchell et al., Defendants, and International Management Group, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 10, 1984


¶ In this contract action for the unpaid balance claimed for interior decorating goods and services, one of the defendants-respondents, IMG, the legal existence of which is disputed, appeared by serving an answer in which it denied the allegations of the complaint and asserted a Statute of Frauds defense. The answer further stated that, for the purpose of this litigation only, IMG is an unincorporated entity that maintains an office at 767 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases