OPINION
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
Appellant was convicted by a jury for the offense of aggravated robbery and the trial court assessed his punishment at thirty years confinement.
Appellant's first and second grounds of error challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.
The evidence reveals that just prior to daylight, at approximately 6:25 o'clock on the morning of February 2, 1982, Malcolm Durdin arrived at his small,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
