¶ Petitioners, who are sergeants in the New York City Police Department, seek credit for answers to certain questions contained in the promotional examination to lieutenant. These answers are not the responses deemed to be the most appropriate by respondents (the so-called "key" answers) but are alleged by petitioners to be as good as, or better than, the key answers designated by respondents. According to the Court of Appeals in Matter of Acosta v Lang (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF BLESSINGER v. ORTIZ
101 A.D.2d 775 (1984)
In the Matter of Peter Blessinger et al., Appellants, v. Juan U. Ortiz, as Personnel Director of The City of New York, et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 22, 1984
May 22, 1984
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
