IZARD CTY. BD. OF EDUC. v. VIOLET HILL SCHOOL

No. CA 83-122.

663 S.W.2d 207 (1984)

IZARD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al, Appellants, v. VIOLET HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 et al, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I.

January 25, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Osmon & Wilber by Norman C. Wilber, Mountain Home, for appellants.

Seay & Bristow by Bill W. Bristow, Jonesboro, for appellees.


GLAZE, Judge.

This case involves a boundary line dispute between the Oxford and Violet Hill school districts. The trial court decided the dispute in Violet Hill's favor. Oxford contends on appeal that the court's decision is against the preponderance of the evidence and that the court erred by applying the wrong law. We affirm.

In its brief, Oxford characterizes this action as the "battle of the maps" — a vivid description depicting a boundary dispute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases