HARTMAN v. SMITH

No. 49589-1.

100 Wn.2d 766 (1984)

674 P.2d 176

DENE C. HARTMAN, Respondent, v. L. MIKE SMITH, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 12, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Eadie (of Eadie & Quirk), for appellant.

Richard B. Sanders, for respondent.


UTTER, J.

Appellant, the father of a minor child, seeks reversal of a trial court order compelling him to pay his former wife $22,555.74 in past due child support. We find that principles of equitable estoppel apply to bar respondent's claim to the past due support.

In May 1973, appellant and respondent were divorced. Respondent mother was awarded custody of their only child, Jayme. Appellant was ordered to pay ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases