1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 681 P.2d
  5. 681 P.2d 178 (1984)
 

MATTER OF COMPENSATION OF MADDOCKS

82-01631; CA A29544.

681 P.2d 178 (1984)

68 Or.App. 372

In the matter of the Compensation of Elmer MADDOCKS, Claimant. Elmer Maddocks, Petitioner, v. HYSTER CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 16, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied June 29, 1984.

Review Denied August 21, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Silk, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Bischoff & Strooband, P.C., Eugene.

Scott H. Terrall, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Meyers & Terrall, and Daniel L. Meyers, Portland.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Claimant appeals an order of the Board which upheld the employer's "partial denial" of claimant's muscle disease claim and found that he has sustained no permanent disability. We reverse the denial and affirm on the extent of disability.

On November 4, 1981, claimant was working as a forklift mechanic for Hyster Corporation when he felt a straining sensation in his arms as he handled a 200 pound...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases