WARDEN, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction for burglary in the first degree. He contends that the trial court erred in ruling that ORS 164.225(1)(a) is not unconstitutionally vague in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
Defendant was charged with burglary of a building described as an office or shop portion of a U.S. Forest Service warehouse under ORS 164.225(1)(a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.