STATE v. RUSSO

Nos. CR 81-8-89; A26013 (Control), CR 81-8-99; CA A26014.

683 P.2d 163 (1984)

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William R. RUSSO, Appellant. State of Oregon, Respondent, v. Barbara R. Fuchs, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 16, 1984.

Review Allowed September 13, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan B. Jordan, Ukiah, Cal., argued the cause for appellants. With her on the briefs was Raymond F. Thomas, Portland.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


GILLETTE, Presiding Judge.

In these consolidated cases, defendants appeal their convictions for manufacturing marijuana in violation of ORS 475.992(1), contending that the trial court should have suppressed the marijuana seized. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse.

On March 22, 1981, while on patrol in a remote area of Curry County, Deputy Sheriff Gibson of Josephine County received an informal complaint that defendants' dogs were running loose and chasing deer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases