1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 687 P.2d
  5. 687 P.2d 156 (1984)
 

IN RE CONDUCT OF MONTGOMERY

No. OSB 81-30; SC S30676.

687 P.2d 156 (1984)

297 Or. 752

In re Complaint As to the CONDUCT OF Kenneth MONTGOMERY, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 5, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joe D. Bailey, of Landis, Aebi, Bailey & Mercer, P.C., Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for the accused.

Morton A. Winkel and Stephen F. Crew, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for the Oregon State Bar.

PER CURIAM.

In this disciplinary matter the accused, Kenneth Montgomery, charged with violating DR 5-105, DR 6-101(A)(3) and DR 6-101(A)(1), was found guilty by the Trial Board of violating solely DR 6-101(A)(3). The Disciplinary Review Board found the accused not guilty of violating DR 6-101(A)(3) and (A)(1), but guilty of violating DR 5-105.1 The relevant facts concerning the accused's conduct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases