STATE v. WISEMAN

No. DA241289; CA A29200.

683 P.2d 153 (1984)

STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Carla WISEMAN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted February 27, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Diana I. Stuart, Metropolitan Public Defender, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

The state appeals from a pretrial order allowing defendant's motion to suppress evidence. ORS 138.060(3). The issue is whether the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest. We conclude that he did and reverse and remand for trial.

Defendant was charged with loitering to solicit prostitution. Portland City Code § 14.24.050.1 At about 6 p.m., Officer Morse, working undercover, observed defendant on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases