1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 105 A.D.2d
  5. 105 A.D.2d 730 (1984)
 

LA ROSA v. GROSSMAN, LIEPZIGER, DANIELS & FREUND

105 A.D.2d 730 (1984)

Henry F. La Rosa, Respondent, v. Grossman, Liepziger, Daniels & Freund et al., Defendants, and David E. Sallah, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 13, 1984

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with Special Term's holding that as trial counsel to the codefendant law firm and plaintiff, defendant Sallah continued in his responsibilities as an attorney in the underlying action until the action terminated in final judgment (see Siegel v Kranis, 29 A.D.2d 477, 489; cf. Marabello v City of New York,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases