1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 751 F.2d
  5. 751 F.2d 82 (1984)
 

ZERMAN v. JACOBS

No. 287, Docket 84-7373.

751 F.2d 82 (1984)

Ernest R. ZERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry A. JACOBS, Jr., individually, H. Virgil Sherrill, individually, and Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided December 13, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Straus, New York City (Jeh Charles Johnson, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, of counsel) for defendants-appellees.

Ernest R. Zerman, pro se.

Before LUMBARD, MANSFIELD and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

When a party, after engaging in a course of harassing litigation, appeals the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion on patently frivolous grounds, double costs plus attorneys fees should be assessed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38. Ernest R. Zerman, a lawyer, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Edward Weinfeld, J.) that denied his Rule 60(b) motion to set aside that court's order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases