RONDINONE v. MATTA


99 A.D.2d 733 (1984)

Eileen Rondinone et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Celeste Matta, Respondent, Arthur Gottesman, Appellant-Respondent, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 23, 1984


If plaintiff Charles Rondinone so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs. The trial court reduced the verdict awarded plaintiff husband, Charles Rondinone, from $50,000 to $35,000 on his claim for derivative damages. The record supports the reduction. However, the court failed to give plaintiff husband the option of a new trial on damages in the event he refused to stipulate to the reduction of the verdict. Therefore, the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases