1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 594 F.Supp.
  5. 594 F.Supp. 233 (1984)
 

IN RE CINCINNATI GAS & ELEC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Nos. C-1-83-1721, C-1-83-1761.

594 F.Supp. 233 (1984)

In re CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC SECURITIES LITIGATION. Ralph RUBIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. William H. DICKHONER, et al., Defendants. Louis PELLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. William H. DICKHONER, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

August 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley M. Chesley, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

John W. Beatty, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Henry J. Kaiser Co. & Raymond Kaiser Engineers.

Robert G. Stachler, Cincinnati, Ohio, for CG & E.

Robert A. Pitcairn, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, for Borgmann.

Douglas G. Cole, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Dickhoner & Yaeger.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING KAISER DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

SPIEGEL, District Judge.

This matter came on for consideration of a motion by defendants Henry J. Kaiser Company and Raymond Kaiser Engineers, Inc. (the Kaiser defendants) to dismiss the amended consolidated class action complaint (doc. 2) against them, or, in the alternative, to compel plaintiffs to make a more definite...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases